More

    Migration in America: From a Security Issue to a Dignity Issue

    Must Read

    TCRN STAFFhttps://www.TheCostaRicaNews.com
    Creating a Conscious alternative news network that we feel the world needs. Pura Vida!

    After the first 21 years of the 21st century, it is confirmed that, in effect, this is the century of migrations in the American continent. We have to figure out how we manage this challenge, take advantage of its potential and transfer it to the agenda that belongs, which is not security but dignity, work and development.

    The magnitude of migratory flows is reflected, among other data, in the fact that 50 million immigrants live in the United States and 8 million in Canada, that is, that 1 out of every 5 migrants in the world lives in North America (UN-DESA , 2020). At the beginning of the 21st century, Mexican migration reached unprecedented figures, with more than 500,000 compatriots trying to reach the United States undocumented.

    The initial agreements between the governments of Mexico and the United States to broaden the spectrum of legal, orderly and temporary migration of workers seemed to even be outlined towards an immigration reform but, as will be remembered, everything fell apart with the attacks of September 11th, 2001.

    The United States tightened its migration policies, especially border protection measures, migration moved to the national security agenda and it was no longer possible to establish a dialogue within the framework of an economic and labor agenda. However, the Mexican population in the American Union increased by four million in the first decade of the century.

    Simultaneously, there was an increase in Central Americans passing through Mexico with the intention of reaching the United States. In 2005, the National Migration Institute (INM) secured and sent to their country for the first time more than 200,000 Guatemalans, Hondurans and Salvadorans.

    Along with the increase in numbers, there was also an increase in abuses and later in crimes committed against migrants. Only then did we realize that as a country we had more clarity and consistency defending our countrymen in the United States than respecting the human rights of Central Americans in Mexico.

    I had to be very close to the undocumented Central Americans in the second half of this century, when we saw the violence against them grow. Could anything be done to protect the human rights of transmigrants in the midst of such a complex context?

    I am going to cite 3 actions that we carried out because in some way they could serve as a reference to guide what can be done now. We prepared a special report on the state of human rights in immigration stations, then a recommendation to respect the rule that only INM personnel should carry out immigration checks, and we prepared a report on migrant kidnappings. The 3 documents were explosive, particularly the third because it was something that happened in the shadows and there was no authority that wanted to recognize it. And for not wanting to do it, unfortunately, 1 year after the report was presented the massacre of 72 migrants occurred in San Fernando, Tamaulipas.

    I believe, however, that these actions, added to others by civil organizations, contributed in those years to reducing the violence against Central Americans in Mexico. Similar efforts could now be made, for example the following:

    1. Make sure that state agents respect the human rights of migrants. This strategy is aimed at not overwhelming us with the complexity of the migratory phenomenon. Yes, it is difficult, but let’s start with what is within our reach. I believe that the current government is in this line of will, but also that it needs to be very effective to ensure that the human rights of migrants are not violated on the roads or in the immigration stations.

    2. Establish that only INM and National Guard agents can carry out immigration checks. This limits contact with migrants to these two instances and reduces the possibility of human rights violations.

    3. Combat human smuggling and trafficking through intelligence and specific actions. We have to prevent more tragedies like the one on December 9, when 56 migrants died and more than 100 were injured. And we also have to prevent labor and sexual exploitation, particularly of women and girls. Let us take charge of the helplessness in which we have left migrants and guarantee their safety and integrity.

    Beyond these actions, I believe, as I have said over the years, that we must work on the causes that force people to abandon their families and homes, which now happens not only for work or economic reasons; but also, and to a large extent, for reasons of insecurity in large areas of Central America and even Mexico. On the other hand, migratory flows are escalating like never before. The United States made 1.7 million migrant arrests on its southern border in fiscal year 2021, of which more than 600,000 were Mexicans. In Mexico, migrant arrests amounted to almost 230,000. Unprecedented figures that confirm that we are facing migratory flows of unprecedented dimensions.

    In the face of the unprecedented facts, one must do unprecedented actions. The countries involved have to sit down to build agreements because none can do it alone. We could, yes, continue to detain migrants and send them back, but the results would still be poor, insufficient and inhumane.

    We must recognize that we have to go further. Undocumented migrants are undocumented by necessity. And the United States has many undocumented workers because it needs them. Let us work together to analyze to what extent migration is an effective satisfier of needs and a development factor, as it is.

    We can agree on a new dimension of authorized flows, how we order them and give them guarantees, and what are the commitments of the migrants themselves. I am not saying it’s easy, but it is possible. It requires understanding and political will, a lot of intelligence, commitment to build agreements and the ability to reach humane and productive solutions in the medium and long term.

    I propose once again to remove migration from the security agenda and transfer it to that of human dignity, shared development, employment and regional growth. Mass migration is a reality and will be for decades to come, so we have to accept that we have a great task that, well done, will not only save us difficulties and tragedies but will also generate benefits for all the countries that in one way or another way we participate in it, either as origin or destination, as territory of passage or return, or as recipients of remittances, all of which, by the way, happens in our country.

    - Advertisement -
    SourceEl País

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    Get all the latest news, events, offers and special announcements.

    Latest News

    Will Costa Rica Join the US and Panama Plan to Deport Migrants?

     “It is a sovereign decision between Panama and the United States; the latter is considering proposals for Costa Rica...

    More Articles Like This

    Language »